| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Date: | 2018-08-03 21:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20180803210134.GD20967@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 01:22:27PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I'm a bit surprised that you decided to push to the 11 branch - the
>> consensus in this thread seem to have gone the other way by my read?
>> Given that that's the rule, and pushing non-fixes is the exception, I'm
>> not particularly ok with just ignoring that?
>
> +1
+1. I have been surprised to see that patch pushed to REL_11_STABLE
when looking at the new log entries today.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-08-03 21:08:04 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-08-03 20:58:52 | Re: Documentaion fix. |