From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Marc Dean <marc(dot)dean(dot)jr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "michael(dot)paul(dot)powers(at)gmail(dot)com" <michael(dot)paul(dot)powers(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15293: Stored Procedure Triggered by Logical Replication is Unable to use Notification Events |
Date: | 2018-07-24 19:27:40 |
Message-ID: | 20180724192740.6yn2xregaz6yhpc2@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tom, Peter,
On 2018-07-24 21:22:18 +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> in fact, I've already tried to build fix. Adding ProcessCompletedNotifies to apply_handle_commit fixed this issue and i think this is right place. In src/backend/tcop/postgres.c we call ProcessCompletedNotifies similar way after commit. This change pass make check-world.
> So i attach my two line patch.
> diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> index 6ca6cdc..e54bd90 100644
> --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>
> #include "commands/tablecmds.h"
> #include "commands/trigger.h"
> +#include "commands/async.h"
>
> #include "executor/executor.h"
> #include "executor/nodeModifyTable.h"
> @@ -490,6 +491,7 @@ apply_handle_commit(StringInfo s)
> replorigin_session_origin_timestamp = commit_data.committime;
>
> CommitTransactionCommand();
> + ProcessCompletedNotifies();
> pgstat_report_stat(false);
>
> store_flush_position(commit_data.end_lsn);
That's probably reasonable for the back branches (although I'd put the
store_flush_position before).
But I wonder if we shouldn't actually move the signalling part of
ProcessCompletedNotifies() into CommitTransactionCommand() in v11. Given
that transactions can now commit without a ready command being sent, due
to the addition of procedures, that kind of seems necessary?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-24 19:30:27 | Re: BUG #15294: Phantom read in serializable transaction when you rename schema. |
Previous Message | Olav Gjerde | 2018-07-24 19:26:05 | Re: BUG #15294: Phantom read in serializable transaction when you rename schema. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | matshyeq | 2018-07-24 20:16:22 | Enhancement request: enable FIRST/LAST_value() also as a regular aggregate (not only as windowing function) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-24 19:19:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case |