Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Craig Ringer' <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Date: 2018-07-23 15:56:41
Message-ID: 20180723155641.uhetkdmlrf5bi7sm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-07-23 11:40:41 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sun Microsystems seemed reasonably trustworthy too.

I don't really agree with that characterization (they've a long history
of weird behaviour around open source, LONG before the Oracle
acquisition). But it doesn't really matter, as they've not breached any
of their hard obligations, have they?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-23 15:56:54 Re: cached plans and enable_partition_pruning
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-07-23 15:55:30 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?