From: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tobias Oberstein <tobias(dot)oberstein(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pread() and pwrite() |
Date: | 2018-07-20 08:14:59 |
Message-ID: | 20180720081459.GC22214@saarenmaa.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 01:55:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> A couple of years ago, Oskari Saarenmaa proposed a patch[1] to adopt
> $SUBJECT. Last year, Tobias Oberstein argued again that we should do
> that[2]. At the end of that thread there was a +1 from multiple
> committers in support of getting it done for PostgreSQL 12. Since
> Oskari hasn't returned, I decided to dust off his patch and start a
> new thread.
Thanks for picking this up - I was meaning to get back to this, but have
unfortunately been too busy with other projects.
> 1. FileRead() and FileWrite() are replaced with FileReadAt() and
> FileWriteAt(), taking a new offset argument. Now we can do one
> syscall instead of two for random reads and writes.
> [...] I'm not even sure I'd bother adding "At" to the
> function names. If there are any extensions that want the old
> interface they will fail to compile either way. Note that the BufFile
> interface remains the same, so hopefully that covers many use cases.
IIRC I used the "At" suffixes in my first version of the patch before
completely removing the functions which didn't take an offset argument
Now that they're gone I agree that we could just drop the "At" suffix;
"at" suffix is also used by various POSIX functions to operate in a
specific directory which may just add to confusion.
> I guess the only remaining reason to use FileSeek() is to get the file
> size? So I wonder why SEEK_SET remains valid in the patch... if my
> suspicion is correct that only SEEK_END still has a reason to exist,
> perhaps we should just kill FileSeek() and add FileSize() or something
> instead?
I see you did this in your updated patch :+1:
Happy to see this patch move forward.
/ Oskari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-20 08:24:23 | Re: [HACKERS] possible self-deadlock window after bad ProcessStartupPacket |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-20 07:56:51 | Re: pread() and pwrite() |