Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Date: 2018-07-12 16:44:44
Message-ID: 20180712164444.qhpar7l4gmr6qkfv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-07-11 09:16:33 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-11, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > Attached, please find an updated patch based on comments by Alvaro.
> > See, if this looks okay to you guys.
>
> LGTM as far as my previous comments are concerned.

I see Amit pushed a patch here yesterday
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=40ca70ebcc9d0bc1c02937b27c44b2766617e790
, is there a need to keep the open item open, or is this the complete fix?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Jelinek 2018-07-12 16:49:22 Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-12 16:43:51 Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian