From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: _isnan() on Windows |
Date: | 2018-07-11 13:13:40 |
Message-ID: | 20180711131340.ip7fyth22xp3zv4w@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Jul-11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 04:23:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> On 2018-Jul-10, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I disagree --- including <float.h> in c.h, as this would have us do,
> >>> seems like a huge expansion of the visibility of that header. Moreover,
> >>> doing that only on Windows seems certain to lead to missing-header
> >>> problems in the reverse direction, ie patches developed on Windows
> >>> will fail elsewhere.
> >
> >> I don't think so, because that's only done for MSVC older than 2013.
> >> Nobody uses that for new development anymore.
> >
> > Hm. OK, maybe it's all right given that. I'm still a bit worried
> > about downsides, but no doubt the buildfarm will tell us.
>
> It seems to me that this patch is a good idea. Any objections if I take
> care of it? I have a Windows VM with only MSVC 2015 if I recall
> correctly though...
I just pushed it before seeing your message.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-11 13:16:33 | Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-07-11 13:01:27 | Re: Add function to release an allocated SQLDA |