| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Date: | 2018-07-03 01:54:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20180703015439.dqtkhmssnbn4ldkg@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-07-02 21:50:36 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-02, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > Andres suggested back in March (and again privately to me) that given how
> > much this has changed from the original this CF item should be marked
> > Returned With Feedback and the current patchset submitted as a new item.
> >
> > Does anyone object to that course of action?
>
> If doing that makes the "CF count" reset back to one for the new
> submission, then I object to that course of action. If we really
> think this item does not belong into this commitfest, lets punt it to
> the next one. However, it seems rather strange to do so this early in
> the cycle. Is there really no small item that could be cherry-picked
> from this series to be committed standalone?
Well, I think it should just have been RWFed last cycle. It got plenty
of feedback. So it doesn't seem that strange to me, not to include it in
the "mop-up" CF? Either way, I don't feel strongly about it, I just know
that I won't have energy for the topic in this CF.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2018-07-03 02:05:57 | Re: automatic restore point |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-03 01:50:36 | Re: Add --include-table-data-where option to pg_dump, to export only a subset of table data |