Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding for OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sfackler(at)gmail(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding for OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1
Date: 2018-06-25 02:33:59
Message-ID: 20180625023359.GC1146@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:19:40AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As Peter and Heikki have worked as well on all those features with me,
> are there any objection to discard this open item? I looked again at
> the patch this morning and it is true that OpenSSL's history makes
> things harder, so keeping code consistent and simple with their last LTS
> version is appealing.

Okay, in consequence, I have moved this open item to the non-bugs
section.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2018-06-25 02:42:49 Is PG built on any C compilers where int division floors?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-06-25 02:30:43 Re: postgresql_fdw doesn't handle defaults correctly