Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Date: 2018-06-21 17:40:08
Message-ID: 20180621174008.hgkjsl5u34e4645n@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-06-21 13:28:46 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I don't think it's at all a bad idea, TBH. It means you only have to add one
> query per version rather than having to adjust all of them.

I'd even say it's an excellent idea.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-21 17:41:29 Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-21 17:31:48 Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade