Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Date: 2018-06-20 04:47:55
Message-ID: 20180620044755.GD19346@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:32:58PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Just a minor nit in the last sentence:
>
> "have to be from" -> "must be from / must belong to"

I think that both have the same meaning, but I am no native speaker so I
may be missing a nuance of some kind.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-06-20 05:31:59 Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-06-20 04:32:58 Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken