From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Jürgen Strobel <juergen+postgresql(at)strobel(dot)info> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation |
Date: | 2018-06-14 01:57:53 |
Message-ID: | 20180614015753.GD1597@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 03:39:04PM +0200, Jürgen Strobel wrote:
> I agree, and I imagine especially being able to use per-partition
> sequences would be a common use case. That was my motivation when I
> discovered it, and it was very counter intuitive to me.
>
> Thanks for the NULL violation patch btw.
Please note that I have added this thread to the Open item page, under
the older bug queue, and that a CF entry has been added so as we don't
lost track of it:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1671/
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-14 02:07:58 | Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation |
Previous Message | 小威 | 2018-06-14 00:08:58 | Re: BUG #15237: I got "ERROR: source for a multiple-column UPDATE item must be a sub-SELECT or ROW() expression" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-06-14 02:07:58 | Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-14 01:49:52 | Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development |