| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest 2018-07 |
| Date: | 2018-06-11 17:34:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20180611173455.uihpry6567m56k5g@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-06-11 11:50:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:38:56AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Thus, if we don't want to have to risk doing surgery on the system (or
> > guarantee we won't bounce any patches from the 07 CF, but that seems like
> > the wrong thing to do), we should rename the existing 09 CF to 07, so all
> > patches automatically end up there, and stick to only "bouncing patches in
> > the forward direction".
>
> So, we have confirmation from the RTM that there will be a 2018-07. And
> there is visibly consensus that renaming 2018-09 to 2018-07 makes the
> most sense. Any objections in moving forward with this renaming at the
> 5-CF plan for v12?
FWIW, I still think it'd be a better plan to explicitly move things,
rather than just rename. But concensus isn't unamity, so ...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2018-06-11 17:50:31 | Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-06-11 17:33:42 | Re: JIT versus standalone-headers checks |