Re: SHOW ALL does not honor pg_read_all_settings membership

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SHOW ALL does not honor pg_read_all_settings membership
Date: 2018-06-07 21:23:57
Message-ID: 20180607212357.aiq4wuqz3fqwe3mu@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-May-31, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 07:05:58PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Any objections to backpatch to v10?
>
> A backpatch is acceptable in my opinion.

Agreed on backpatching.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-07 21:25:01 Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-06-07 21:19:18 Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots