| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: adding tab completions |
| Date: | 2018-05-29 14:24:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20180529142409.GL24007@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:12:27AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Is it just me that finds shocking the notion of vacuuming a foreign
> table?
I guess it would be nice to have the ability to tab complete that,
assuming it would actually do something at least potentially useful,
but until then, you're not alone.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2018-05-29 14:53:18 | Re: behave of --create-slot option |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-29 14:12:27 | Re: adding tab completions |