add default parallel query to v10 release notes? (Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10))

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: add default parallel query to v10 release notes? (Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10))
Date: 2018-05-25 01:00:25
Message-ID: 20180525010025.GT30060@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Moving to -hackers;

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:53:10PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 02:45:15PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Is it because max_parallel_workers_per_gather now defaults to 2 ?
> >
> > BTW, I would tentatively expect a change in default to be documented in the
> > release notes but can't see that it's.
> > 77cd477c4ba885cfa1ba67beaa82e06f2e182b85
>
> Oops, you are correct. The PG 10 release notes, which I wrote, should
> have mentioned this. :-(

I just saw your January response to my October mail..

Maybe it's silly to update PG10 notes 9 months after release..
..but, any reason not to add to v10 release notes now (I don't know if the web
docs would be updated until the next point release?)

Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asim Praveen 2018-05-25 01:03:17 Keeping temporary tables in shared buffers
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-05-25 00:24:23 Re: ParseDateTime in src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2018-05-25 01:27:31 Re: propose web form for submission of performance problems
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2018-05-24 23:57:13 propose web form for submission of performance problems