From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Date: | 2018-05-23 01:36:52 |
Message-ID: | 20180523013652.GG12538@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:28:41AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Uh, we already have this in the release notes:
> >
> > Allow faster partition elimination during query processing (Amit
> > Langote, David Rowley, Dilip Kumar)
> >
> > This speeds access to partitioned tables with many partitions.
> >
> > Do you want me to add the git commit hash to this release note entry?
>
> I suppose you meant the above as an entry for performance improvement of
> partition "pruning". The commit I quoted is concerned with making "tuple
> routing" a bit faster, but as David said that's not making it as fast as
> it could really be. So, we should hold off from touting it as an
> improvement at this point and I have to agree. Sorry for the noise.
OK, no problem. So _finding_ the rows is faster, but adding rows to
partitioned tables with many partitions is still slow, got it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-05-23 01:37:22 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-05-23 01:34:56 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-05-23 01:37:22 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-05-23 01:34:56 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |