Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, mark(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?
Date: 2018-05-22 14:31:00
Message-ID: 20180522143100.GE1684@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Tom Lane 2018-03-23 <1219(dot)1521831286(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> The compromise I'm inclined to offer is to see what happens if we
> back-patch 9.4's config.guess and config.sub. If that makes these
> animals go green, and doesn't break any others, we'll call it good.
> Otherwise, we revert that change and say we're not putting any
> additional effort into it.

Fwiw, apt.postgresql.org has been building+regression testing 9.3 on
ppc64el on various Debian+Ubuntu releases for more than a year now.
The only requirement is updating config.guess/sub.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2018-05-22 14:33:57 PG11 jit failing on ppc64el
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2018-05-22 14:22:20 Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems