Re: Postgres 11 release notes

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:34:54PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 11 release notes.  I
> will add more markup soon.  You can view the most current version here:
>
>         http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-11.html
>
> I expect a torrent of feedback.  ;-)
>
> On a personal note, I want to apologize for not adequately championing
> two features that I think have strategic significance but didn't make it
> into Postgres 11:  parallel FDW access and improved multi-variate
> statistics.  I hope to do better job during Postgres 12.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
> +                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +
>
>
>
> I think the below commit is missed in the release notes?
>
> 5edc63bda68a77c4d38f0cbeae1c4271f9ef4100
>
> Committer: Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>  2017-11-10 13:50:50
>
>     Account for the effect of lossy pages when costing bitmap scans.
>     
>     Dilip Kumar, reviewed by Alexander Kumenkov, Amul Sul, and me.
>     Some final adjustments by me.
>
> As part of this commit, we are also accounting for the lossy pages during
> bitmap costing.  This will consider
> the effect of work_mem while selecting the bitmap heap scan path.

Uh, that seems very exotic to mention, sorry. Others have opinions?

I have updated the PG11 doc URL with all the changes so far.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +