Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indexes on partitioned tables and foreign partitions
Date: 2018-05-14 17:29:10
Message-ID: 20180514172910.wjuvrtcdhcc5y3u7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-May-10, Amit Langote wrote:

> How about we error out even *before* calling DefineIndex for the 1st time?
> I see that ProcessUtilitySlow() gets a list of all partitions when
> locking them for index creation before calling DefineIndex. Maybe, just
> go through the list and error out if one of them is a partition that we
> don't support creating an index on?

The overwhelming consensus seems to be for this option, so I pushed your
patch after some small tweaks -- mostly to simplify unnecessarily
baroque code. (I must have been thinking that recursion would happen
right in ProcessUtilitySlow. That doesn't match my memories, but I
can't explain this code otherwise.) I added a very small test too.

I think it'd be better to take this out of ProcessUtility also and into
DefineInde, for cleanliness sake; maybe add a 'recursing' flag to
DefineIndex. Not for pg11, though.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2018-05-14 17:46:07 Re: SPI/backend equivalent of extended-query Describe(statement)?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-05-14 17:15:48 Re: SPI/backend equivalent of extended-query Describe(statement)?