From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance issues while running select sql query |
Date: | 2018-04-29 14:18:11 |
Message-ID: | 20180429141811.GP20071@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:05:23AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> # SELECT serorgid,appname,sum(message_count) AS mtrc0,date_trunc('day',
> client_received_start_timestamp at time zone '+5:30:0')::timestamp without
> time zone AS time_unit FROM analytics."test.prod.fact" WHERE
> client_received_start_timestamp >= '2018-3-28 18:30:0' AND
> client_received_start_timestamp < '2018-4-11 18:30:0' AND ((apiproxy in
> ('test-service' ) ) and (exchangeinstance != '(not set)' ) and (devemail
> != 'test(at)example(dot)com' ) and (devemail != 'srk(at)example(dot)com' ) and
> (devemail != 'abc(at)example(dot)com' ) and (devemail != 'xyz(at)example(dot)com' ) and
> (apistatus = 'Success' ) and (apiaction not in
> ('LRN','finder','ManuallySelect' ) ) and (appname not in ('Mobile Connect
> Developer Portal (Int(', 'MinskHBM', 'LondonHBM', 'SeoulHBM', 'MumbaiHBM',
> 'NVirginiaHBM','SPauloHBM', 'Mobile Connect HeartBeat Monitor',
> 'PDMAOpenSDKTest1', 'PDMAOpenSDKTest2', 'PDMASDKTest', 'APIHealth',
> 'A1qaDemoApp','test', 'dublin o2o test tool', 'Test from John do not
> provision' ) ) and (serorgid = 'aircel' )) GROUP BY
> serorgid,appname,time_unit ORDER BY time_unit DESC LIMIT 14400 OFFSET 0;
This table has inheritence children. Do they have constraints? On what
column? Is constraint_exclusion enabled and working for that?
It looks like test.prod.fact_624 is being read using index in under 1sec, and
the rest using seq scan, taking 5-10sec.
So what are the table+index definitions of the parent and childs (say fact_624
and 631).
Have the child tables been recently ANALYZE ?
Also, have you manually ANALYZE the parent table?
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:48:48AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > QUERY PLAN
> > Limit (cost=2568002.26..2568038.26 rows=14400 width=35) (actual time=127357.296..127357.543 rows=231 loops=1)
> > Buffers: shared hit=28019 read=1954681
...
> > -> Index Scan using "test.prod.fact_624_client_received_start_timestamp_idx" on "test.prod.fact_624" (cost=0.42..10948.27 rows=1002 width=34) (actual time=3.034..278.320 rows=1231 loops=1)
> > Index Cond: ((client_received_start_timestamp >= '2018-03-28 18:30:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (client_received_start_timestamp < '2018-04-11 18:30:00'::timestamp without time zone))
> > Rows Removed by Filter: 42629
> > Buffers: shared hit=27966 read=498
> > -> Seq Scan on "test.prod.fact_631" (cost=0.00..171447.63 rows=16464 width=34) (actual time=0.070..7565.812 rows=20609 loops=1)
> > Rows Removed by Filter: 645406
> > Buffers: shared hit=2 read=132279
...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kaushal Shriyan | 2018-04-29 18:10:58 | Re: Performance issues while running select sql query |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-04-29 12:34:41 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |