| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Typo in JIT documentation |
| Date: | 2018-04-27 00:25:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20180427002519.GD3419@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hmm, I thought we talked about changing such references to say 'JIT
> compilation' rather than just 'JIT'.
Perhaps. I recall that this has been mentioned already the last couple
of weeks on the JIT thread. Personally, I can see that JIT is listed as
an acronym in the docs with its meaning explained by a link to
wikipedia about just-in-time compilation, so I am fine with the use of
the acronym. "JIT" is actually used without the <acronym> markup in
config.sgml. I think that at least this part should be fixed.
At the end that would be mainly Andres' call? Do you think that an open
item would be adapted?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-04-27 00:32:39 | Re: description of root_tuple_slot missing |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-04-27 00:20:40 | Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards |