Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-20 15:58:50
Message-ID: 20180420155850.gu2c3rmjkgx7wcd3@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Langote wrote:

> PS: git grep "partition by hash\|PARTITION BY HASH" on src/test indicates
> that there are hash partitioning related tests in create_table,
> foreign_key, and partition_join files as well. Do we want to use the
> custom opclass in those files as well?

By the way, let me suggest 'git grep -i' instead.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-04-20 16:14:28 Re: Postgres stucks in deadlock detection
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-20 15:36:58 Re: Postgres stucks in deadlock detection