Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
Date: 2018-04-14 21:13:33
Message-ID: 20180414211333.rvu4qdmogsyy2unw@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-04-14 17:10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On April 14, 2018 1:56:08 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> The project policy is to use exactly the GNU distribution of autoconf.
>
> > Fwiw, I see one copyright year related diff with unmodified upstream autoconf.
>
> Really? Where did you get autoconf from? My archived copy of
> autoconf-2.69.tar.gz, fetched 2013-11-15, has internal file
> dates of (mostly) 2012-04-24. That matches the file dates at
> https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/
> so I've not actually pulled down fresh bits to compare, but ...

The v2.69 git tag. So I guess that's set somewhere in the tarball
building. Hrmpf.

The half unmaintainedness of autoconf (no release in five years counts
as that imo), sure makes it look like a good idea to move on to cmake or
such at some point...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2018-04-14 22:31:14 Re: Proposal: Adding json logging
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-14 21:10:21 Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?