| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: submake-errcodes |
| Date: | 2018-04-12 19:33:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20180412193302.abqtv2qmgqzabod2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-12 11:22:45 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> >> Is it worth exploring the idea of changing to a non-recursive style of
> >> makefile?
> >
> > Not post-feature-freeze, for sure. Whether it's worth the work as a
> > long-term project, I dunno.
>
> I've been taking a look at this in my limited free time, so I might as
> well publicly register my interest here. Moving to non-recursive Make
> will probably be quite a bit of work/pain, but I also think it's
> probably worth it in the end.
Yea, it'd sure be nice. Whether it's worth the pain or whether the time
is better spent moving to cmake or such, I'm not sure.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-04-12 19:39:19 | Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance |
| Previous Message | Keith Fiske | 2018-04-12 19:25:30 | Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance |