Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com, jdnelson(at)dyn(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Date: 2018-04-09 05:19:24
Message-ID: 20180409.141924.246254700.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:59:45 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in <20180409045945(dot)GB1740(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:26:54PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > Hello, I added this as Older Bugs in Open items. (I believe it's
> > legit.)
>
> Yes, I think that's adapted. I am hesitating to do the same thing with
> all the other patches marked as bug fixes.

Thanks. I'm also not going to do so on the other "bug fix"es. The
reasons for this patch are I myself recently had a suspected case
(on a costomer site) and the size is not so large. (This doesn't
mean it is easy, of couse..)

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Thakkar 2018-04-09 09:35:50 Re: installer for windows by enterprisedb doesn't accpet some chars as password
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-09 04:59:45 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2018-04-09 06:01:20 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-09 05:11:12 Fix pg_rewind which can be run as root user