Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date: 2018-04-08 00:15:09
Message-ID: 20180408001509.lpxp42cszn45d6qc@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Yeah, I don't quite understand this problem, and I tend to agree that
it likely isn't this patch's fault. However, for the moment I'm going
to avoid pushing the patch you propose because maybe there's a bug
elsewhere and it'd be good to understand it. I'm looking at it now.

If others would prefer me to push David's patch (or do so themselves),
I'm not dead set against that.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-08 01:32:58 pgsql: Remove overzeleous assertions in pg_atomic_flag code.
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 23:38:23 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-08 01:30:05 Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-04-08 00:00:01 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench - allow to store select results into variables