| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 15:26:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20180407152639.3jfaxalgyquubv3v@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-04-07 10:14:49 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Can the pg_verify_checksums command be kept at least, please?
>
> AFAICT this one is not contentious, the code is isolated, it's really
> useful, orthogonal to online checksum activation and argueably could've
> been committed as a separate patch anyway.
I've not looked at it in any meaningful amount of detail, but it does
seem a lot lower risk from here.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-07 15:48:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-04-07 15:16:22 | Re: Boolean partitions syntax |