Re: Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch
Date: 2018-04-07 12:31:48
Message-ID: 20180407123148.GA9262@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 09:25:44AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would
>> be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be
>> a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly.
>> But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be
>> gained thereby.
>
> I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h.

+1 on that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 12:33:37 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-04-07 12:27:59 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (the good and the bad)