Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
Date: 2018-04-06 21:02:34
Message-ID: 20180406210234.ebt7tqpkwpem7z7w@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-04-06 16:59:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It sure looks like there's been a frantic push to commit stuff that
> maybe wasn't quite fully baked. I'm not terribly on board with that,
> because it's likely to be hard to disentangle who broke what.
> But in particular, it's clear that partition_prune and
> isolation/checksum_cancel are showing big problems.

While I'm obviously also unhappy about the frantic push to push semi
baked stuff, I'm not sure the two issues you point to above are that
good examples of carelessness. At least the latter seems mostly a pretty
normal portability thing around orderedness?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-06 21:03:30 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-06 20:59:11 The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks