| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 15:46:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20180406154626.fimlw63ifer25ufo@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote wrote:
> Some comments on the code reorganizing part of the patch:
>
> * Did you intentionally not put PartitionBoundInfoData and its accessor
> macros in partition_internal.h. partprune.c would not need to include
> partition.h if we do that.
Not really.
After pondering this some more, I decided to call the new file
src/include/partition/partbounds.h; and the other new file will become
src/include/partition/partprune.h. This leads naturally to the idea
that PartitionBoundInfoData will be in partbounds.h. However, the
typedef struct PartitionBoundInfoData *PartitionBoundInfo will have to
remain in catalog/partition.h, at least for the time being.
> * Also, I wonder why you left PartitionPruneContext in partition.h. Isn't
> it better taken out to partprune.h?
Yes.
> * Why isn't gen_partprune_steps() in partprune.h? I see only
> prune_append_rel_partitions() exported out of partprune.c, but the runtime
> patch needs gen_partprune_steps() to be called from createplan.c.
> * I don't see get_matching_partitions() exported either. Runtime pruning
> patch needs that too.
True -- both exported.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-06 15:49:28 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-04-06 15:41:06 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |