Re: Wiki editor request

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mototaka Kanematsu <mototaka(dot)kanematsu(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wiki editor request
Date: 2018-04-05 18:43:44
Message-ID: 20180405184344.GA29402@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:54:09AM +0900, Mototaka Kanematsu wrote:
> Thank you for polite explanation.
>
> I understood your concern. These days, patent issue is sensitive concern.
>
> >On 2018-04-04 06:44, Mototaka Kanematsu wrote:
> >>In private judgment, I don't enforce a patent right for PostgreSQL.
>
> I mean if our code includes our patent, there are no-charge, royalty-free in that.
>
> I would like to know cases of other companies regarding patent.
> In my understanding, engineers of big companies contributed the source code to PostgreSQL community.
> Such as Google, VMware, NTT group, Fujitsu and so on.
> I think they have many good patents for database technology more than Toshiba.
> They maybe ever faced same situation in myself. I would like to know how they avoided the situation.
>
> Anyway, I'm waiting discussion by the PostgreSQL Core team.

Yes, you are right that companies that have patents are contributing to
Postgres. We ask that people contributing to Postgres not study any
patented material so we are less likely to have a patent problem.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-05 18:47:54 Re: Wiki editor request
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-04-05 18:25:10 Re: [noreply@postgresql.org: coder]