From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: New files for MERGE |
Date: | 2018-04-05 18:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 20180405181951.43kfg4gm3ynhooxv@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-05 06:09:31 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Well, what's on the table is reverting this patch and asking you to try
> > again in the v12 cycle. Given Andres' concerns about the executor design,
> > and mine about the way the parsing end is built, there's certainly no way
> > that that's all getting fixed by Saturday. Given pretty much everybody's
> > unhappiness with the way this patch was forced through at the last minute,
> > I do not think you should expect that we'll say, "okay, we'll let you ship
> > a bad version of MERGE because there's no more time in this cycle".
>
> +1.
+1.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-04-05 18:56:23 | pgsql: Fix plan cache issue in PL/pgSQL CALL |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-04-05 17:16:52 | Re: pgsql: Optimize btree insertions for common case of increasing values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-05 18:27:58 | Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-05 17:30:07 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |