Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1)
Date: 2018-04-03 00:57:12
Message-ID: 20180403005712.GB12774@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 10:08:34AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> However, it helps explain the disagreements about pgbench features: pgbench
> internal developer-oriented use for postgres is somehow limited, and a lot
> of new features are suggested with an external performance benchmarking use
> in mind, about which core committers do not seem much interested.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-04-03 01:29:28 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-04-03 00:48:00 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS