From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | scott(dot)ure(at)caseware(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing |
Date: | 2018-03-30 14:40:07 |
Message-ID: | 20180330144007.GH8476@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> > From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT"
> > in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc,
> > however this does not appear to be documented, only "IS DOCUMENT" is.
> >
> It has been like that since day 1. I'm not sure why it was not
> documented. It already has some tests. I'll bet that was an oversight.
> Should we repeat the statement in another item (like the attached
> patch)? Another option is to add a statement in the "IS DOCUMENT"
> item. I'm afraid that NULL return wouldn't be clear.
>
Patch applied and backpatched to Postgres 10. Thank.s
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-03-30 15:18:28 | Re: Documentation for varbit is missing size parameter |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-03-29 22:33:47 | PQdescribePrepared / binary data |