Re: Small proposal to improve out-of-memory messages

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small proposal to improve out-of-memory messages
Date: 2018-03-29 02:33:24
Message-ID: 20180329023324.GB2291@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:29:59AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> This would have been significantly useful to me in the past, so +1 from me.

As long as that does not cost more memory, +1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-03-29 02:48:27 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-29 02:30:59 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS