| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? |
| Date: | 2018-03-26 06:20:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20180326062000.GD2759@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:01:53PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I'm inclined to just ask them to stop running the animals on that
>> branch. There are no pre-existing users on 9.3 ppc64le, and new
>> customers hopefully won't move to 9.3. ISTM backpatching is riskier than
>> just changing a bunch of buildfarm configurations.
>
> +1 for dropping it.
+1. If something like that were to happen for 10 or 9.6 knowing that
they still have four years to go, that could be debated, but just for 6
months there is little benefit.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksandr Parfenov | 2018-03-26 06:24:05 | Re: new function for tsquery creartion |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-26 06:15:16 | Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE |