Re: pg_stat_statements: password in command is not obfuscated

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: password in command is not obfuscated
Date: 2018-03-25 09:15:10
Message-ID: 20180325091510.GA3707@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:17:30PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> If it is, then it's not a bug in pg_stat_statements. log_statement =
> 'ddl' would have kept a record of the same thing.
>
> Perhaps the best fix would be a documentation improvement to mention
> the fact and that it's best not to use plain text passwords in
> CREATE/ALTER ROLE. Passwords can be md5 encrypted.

Yeah, this is bad practice. That's one of the reasons why storage of
plain text passwords has been removed in Postgres 10 still they can be
passed via command, and also why PQencryptPasswordConn and
PQencryptPassword are useful. Using psql's \password is a good habit to
have.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message HORDER Phil 2018-03-26 09:10:49 RE: Foreign Key locking / deadlock issue.... v2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-25 04:18:11 Re: Troubleshooting a segfault and instance crash