From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backend memory dump analysis |
Date: | 2018-03-23 19:01:41 |
Message-ID: | 20180323190141.y5ys6ujkm4gv6ygt@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-03-23 14:33:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> func_cxt = AllocSetContextCreate(TopMemoryContext,
> "PL/pgSQL function context",
> ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_SIZES);
> plpgsql_compile_tmp_cxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(func_cxt);
>
> function->fn_signature = format_procedure(fcinfo->flinfo->fn_oid);
> + MemoryContextSetIdentifier(func_cxt, function->fn_signature);
> function->fn_oid = fcinfo->flinfo->fn_oid;
> function->fn_xmin = HeapTupleHeaderGetRawXmin(procTup->t_data);
>
> This would cost an extra char * field in struct MemoryContextData,
> which is slightly annoying but it doesn't exactly seem like a killer.
> Then the memory stats dump code would just need to know to print this
> field if it isn't NULL.
That's not a bad idea. How about storing a Node* instead of a char*?
Then we could have MemoryContextStats etc support digging out details
for a few types, without having to generate strings at runtime.
> If we wanted to do this I'd suggest sneaking it into v11, so that
> if people have to adapt their code because of 9fa6f00b1 breaking
> usages with nonconstant context names, they have a solution to turn to
> immediately rather than having to change things again in v12.
Yea, that'd make sense.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-03-23 19:01:53 | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-23 18:58:10 | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? |