From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: faster testing with symlink installs |
Date: | 2018-03-22 03:43:38 |
Message-ID: | 20180322034338.GH2490@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 05:06:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> TBH I find that Homebrew example pretty odd. I would understand
> installing each major release in a version directory, but putting
> every point release in a different versioned directory seems like a
> bad plan.
That's a project policy on their side. The version of all components is
kept around this way to give users the easier possibility to link or use
back a previous version if a component update does wrong. There are
advantages to such models as well for projects which care a lot about
some precise compatibility that some upstream maintainer overlooked,
while not having to patch an existing instance to filter out only a set
of components.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-22 03:53:49 | Re: faster testing with symlink installs |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-22 03:22:56 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2 |