| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
| Date: | 2018-03-22 01:49:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20180322014957.GF2490@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:42:35AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I'm super excited by the idea of multi-version support in TAP, if that's
> what you mean.
>
> Why? Because I use TAP heavily in extensions. Especially replication
> extensions. Which like to talk across multiple versions. I currently need
> external test frameworks and some hideous hacks to do this.
Okay, in front of such enthusiasm we could keep at least the refactoring
part of PostgresNode.pm :)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2018-03-22 01:52:39 | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-22 01:42:35 | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |