| From: | "Battuello, Louis" <louis(dot)battuello(at)etasseo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Re: Foreign Key Validation after Reference Table Ownership Change |
| Date: | 2018-03-21 15:30:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20180321083033.f495bf0537e129b62c3edf58e37f64ff.23347c6e15.mailapi@email02.godaddy.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
So, user_2 needs usage on the schema containing its newly owned reference table even though user_1 is performing the insert on a table in the other schema? Interesting. I though the validation was only dependent on user_1's ACL.
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: Foreign Key Validation after Reference Table Ownership Change
From: "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: 3/21/18 11:23 am
To: "Battuello, Louis" <louis(dot)battuello(at)etasseo(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
On Wednesday, March 21, 2018, Battuello, Louis <louis(dot)battuello(at)etasseo(dot)com> wrote:
What permission is being violated at the schema level?
USAGE
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-grant.html
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alessandro Aste | 2018-03-21 16:09:57 | Postgresql 10.3 , query never completes if LIMIT clause is specified and paralle processing is on |
| Previous Message | HORDER Phil | 2018-03-21 15:26:17 | RE: Foreign Key locking / deadlock issue.... v2 |