| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2018-03-16 01:24:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20180316012436.sfok6b3bkdwt3r4v@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I think this is a worthwhile test, but IMO it should be improved a bit
> > before we include it. Also, we can come up with a better name for the
> > test surely, not just refer to this particular bug. Maybe "typemap".
>
> It might be useful if we have the facility of TAP test to check the
> log message and regexp-match the message to the expected string.
Something similar to PostgresNode::issues_sql_like() perhaps?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-16 01:25:35 | Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-16 01:23:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian a bit) |