From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 |
Date: | 2018-03-13 18:40:36 |
Message-ID: | 20180313184036.pqh7ph2zid73zfeo@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-03-13 14:36:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Currently a handful of explain outputs in the regression tests change
> > output when compiled with JITing. Therefore I'm thinking of adding
> > JITINFO or such option, which can be set to false for those tests?
>
> Can we spell that JIT or at least JIT_INFO?
The latter works, I don't have a strong opinion on that. For now I've
just tied it to COSTS off.
> I realize that EXPLAIN (JIT OFF) may sound like it's intended to
> disable JIT itself
Yea, that's what I'm concerned about.
> , but I think it's pretty clear that EXPLAIN (BUFFERS OFF) does not
> disable the use of actual buffers, only the display of buffer-related
> information.
Hm.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-03-13 18:44:01 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-13 18:36:44 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 |