Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Date: 2018-03-13 18:40:36
Message-ID: 20180313184036.pqh7ph2zid73zfeo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-03-13 14:36:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Currently a handful of explain outputs in the regression tests change
> > output when compiled with JITing. Therefore I'm thinking of adding
> > JITINFO or such option, which can be set to false for those tests?
>
> Can we spell that JIT or at least JIT_INFO?

The latter works, I don't have a strong opinion on that. For now I've
just tied it to COSTS off.

> I realize that EXPLAIN (JIT OFF) may sound like it's intended to
> disable JIT itself

Yea, that's what I'm concerned about.

> , but I think it's pretty clear that EXPLAIN (BUFFERS OFF) does not
> disable the use of actual buffers, only the display of buffer-related
> information.

Hm.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-13 18:44:01 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-03-13 18:36:44 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11