From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |
Date: | 2018-03-12 07:28:56 |
Message-ID: | 20180312072856.GA23071@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:51:14PM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> How about a GUC that enforces one mode or the other on startup? Default
> would be 700. The GUC can be set automatically by initdb based on the
> -g option. We had this GUC originally, but since the front-end tools
> can't read it we abandoned it. Seems like it would be good as an
> enforcing mechanism, though.
Hm. OK. I can see the whole set of points about that. Please let me
think a bit more about that bit. Do you think that there could be a
pool of users willing to switch from one mode to another? Compared to
your v1, we could indeed have a GUC which enforces a restriction to not
allow group access, and enabled by default. As the commit fest is
running and we don't have a clear picture yet, I am afraid that it may
be better to move that to v12, and focus on getting patches 1 and 2
committed. This will provide a good base for the next move.
There are three places where things are still not correct:
- if (chmod(location, S_IRWXU) != 0)
+ current_umask = umask(0);
+ umask(current_umask);
+
+ if (chmod(location, PG_DIR_MODE_DEFAULT & ~current_umask) != 0)
This is in tablespace.c.
@@ -185,6 +186,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
exit(1);
}
+ /* Set dir/file mode mask */
+ umask(PG_MODE_MASK_DEFAULT);
+
In pg_rewind and pg_resetwal, isn't that also a portion which is not
necessary without the group access feature?
This is all I have basically for patch 2, which would be good for
shipping.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-03-12 07:55:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-03-12 06:54:26 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |