From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug fix] pg_rewind creates corrupt WAL files, and the standby cannot catch up the primary |
Date: | 2018-03-11 14:56:33 |
Message-ID: | 20180311145632.GP10417@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:04:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:22:49AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > Thanks for reviewing. All done.
>
> Thanks. Please be careful with the indentation of the patch. Attached
> is a slightly-updated version with a small modification in
> remove_target_file to make the code cleaner, a proposal of commit
> message and pgindent applied on the code. I am switching that as ready
> for committer.
> --
> Michael
> From 62950c615d87e3e58998f295ce446eb5c80707e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 22:49:55 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix handling of removed files on target server with pg_rewind
>
> After processing the filemap to build the list of chunks that will be
> fetched from the source to rewing the target server, it is possible that
> a file which was previously processed is removed from the source. A
> simple example of such an occurence is a WAL segment which gets recycled
> on the target in-between. When the filemap is processed, files not
> categorized as relation files are first truncated to prepare for its
> full copy of which is going to be taken from the source, divided into a
> set of junks.
Hopefully a set of CHUNKS not JUNKS ?
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-03-11 14:59:36 | Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default |
Previous Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2018-03-11 14:22:29 | Inconsistent behavior in serializable snapshot |