From: | Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Authentication? |
Date: | 2018-03-07 15:14:11 |
Message-ID: | 20180307161411.6825f466@pennywise-btj.brreg.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 07:14:55 -0700
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is it possible to use one authentication method as default, like LDAP, and
> > if the user is not found, then try to authenticate using
> > md5/scram-sha-256 ?
> >
>
> In the "Client Authentication" Chapter:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/auth-pg-hba-conf.html
>
> """
> The first record with a matching connection type, client address,
> requested database, and user name is used to perform authentication. There
> is no “fall-through” or “backup”: if one record is chosen and the
> authentication fails, subsequent records are not considered. If no record
> matches, access is denied.
> """
>
> David J.
I was hoping I had misunderstood but ok.. :)
BTJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-03-07 15:19:14 | Re: Authentication? |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-03-07 14:14:55 | Re: Authentication? |