| From: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |
| Date: | 2018-03-07 13:18:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20180307131819.GA13301@zakirov.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-03-07 14:10 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > 2018-03-07 13:58 GMT+01:00 Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>:
> >> Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
> >> implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
> >> too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
> >> commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
> >> made dictionaries maintenance harder.
> >>
> >
> > Postgres hasn't any subsystem based on modification time, so introduction
> > this sensitivity, I don't see, practical.
> >
>
> Usually the shared dictionaries are used for complex language based
> fulltext. The frequence of updates of these dictionaries is less than
> updates PostgreSQL. The czech dictionary is same 10 years.
Agree. In this case auto reloading isn't important feature here.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ildar Musin | 2018-03-07 13:21:50 | Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench |
| Previous Message | Prabhat Sahu | 2018-03-07 13:13:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |