Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
Date: 2018-03-06 14:00:25
Message-ID: 20180306140024.GA12795@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:09:50PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Agreed. I added a comment to that function. I think that that comment in
> combination with changes to the FDW docs in the patch would help FDW authors
> understand why that is needed. Please find attached an updated version of
> the patch.

Thank you.

All tests pass, the documentation builds. There was the suggestion [1]
of different approach. But the patch fix the issue in much more simple
way.

Marked as "Ready for Commiter".

1 - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20171005.200631.134118679.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2018-03-06 14:04:59 Re: Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows
Previous Message Ildar Musin 2018-03-06 13:47:43 Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench