From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #1) |
Date: | 2018-03-05 23:43:15 |
Message-ID: | 20180305234315.lyyh33mrc5byqrle@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-03-04 11:03:05 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > A lot of contributors, including serial ones, don't even remotely put in
> > as much resources reviewing other people's patches as they use up in
> > reviewer and committer bandwidth. You certainly have contributed more
> > patches than you've reviewed for example.
>
> Please check your numbers before criticising someone unduly.
I did. I filtered emails by threads, and counted the number of
messages.
> > Note that pgbench code does add work, even if one is not using the new
> > features. As you know, I was working on performance and robustness
> > improvements, and to make sure they are and stay correct I was
> > attempting to compile postgres with -fsanitize=overflow - which fails
> > because pgbench isn't overflow safe. I reported that, but you didn't
> > follow up with fixes.
>
> Indeed. AFAICR you did it before, I think that I reviewed it, it was not a
> period for which I had a lot of available time, and I did not feel it was
> something that urgent to fix because there was no practical impact. I would
> have done it later, probably.
It's still not fixed.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2018-03-05 23:48:38 | Re: jsonpath |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-03-05 23:35:22 | Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication |