Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date: 2018-03-01 10:28:54
Message-ID: 20180301102854.wezsrtshdguh2lke@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-02-01 09:04:57 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've been testing this a bit further and during a test setup with 4-byte
> bools I still got regression test failures related to GIN, so it doesn't
> seem quite ready. I'll keep working on it.

Are you planning to get this into v11? The CF entry
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1444/
lists this as "ready for committer" which doesn't seem to jive with the
above description?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-03-01 10:30:39 Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-01 10:27:13 Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient